Global Weirding Is Here

This subforum is for discussions of any issues and concerns that impact the environment, such as biodiversity, global climate change, genetically engineered plants and animals, human population, animal and nature conservation, natural disasters, etc.
Forum rules
This subforum is for discussions of any issues and concerns that impact the environment, such as biodiversity, global climate change, genetically engineered plants and animals, human population, animal and nature conservation, natural disasters, etc. Host: Kernos

Global Weirding Is Here

Postby Kernos » 18 Feb 2010, 19:48

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/opini ... ef=opinion

I agree with everything this guy says. And, please check out http://climateprogress.org/ for accurate info.

:zen:

February 17, 2010
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Global Weirding Is Here

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN :bilbo:

Of the festivals of nonsense that periodically overtake American politics, surely the silliest is the argument that because Washington is having a particularly snowy winter it proves that climate change is a hoax and, therefore, we need not bother with all this girly-man stuff like renewable energy, solar panels and carbon taxes. Just drill, baby, drill.

When you see lawmakers like Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina tweeting that “it is going to keep snowing until Al Gore cries ‘uncle,’ ” or news that the grandchildren of Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma are building an igloo next to the Capitol with a big sign that says “Al Gore’s New Home,” you really wonder if we can have a serious discussion about the climate-energy issue anymore.

The climate-science community is not blameless. It knew it was up against formidable forces — from the oil and coal companies that finance the studies skeptical of climate change to conservatives who hate anything that will lead to more government regulations to the Chamber of Commerce that will resist any energy taxes. Therefore, climate experts can’t leave themselves vulnerable by citing non-peer-reviewed research or failing to respond to legitimate questions, some of which happened with both the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Although there remains a mountain of research from multiple institutions about the reality of climate change, the public has grown uneasy. What’s real? In my view, the climate-science community should convene its top experts — from places like NASA, America’s national laboratories, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford, the California Institute of Technology and the U.K. Met Office Hadley Centre — and produce a simple 50-page report. They could call it “What We Know,” summarizing everything we already know about climate change in language that a sixth grader could understand, with unimpeachable peer-reviewed footnotes.

At the same time, they should add a summary of all the errors and wild exaggerations made by the climate skeptics — and where they get their funding. It is time the climate scientists stopped just playing defense. The physicist Joseph Romm, a leading climate writer, is posting on his Web site, climateprogress.org, his own listing of the best scientific papers on every aspect of climate change for anyone who wants a quick summary now.

Here are the points I like to stress:

1) Avoid the term “global warming.” I prefer the term “global weirding,” because that is what actually happens as global temperatures rise and the climate changes. The weather gets weird. The hots are expected to get hotter, the wets wetter, the dries drier and the most violent storms more numerous.

The fact that it has snowed like crazy in Washington — while it has rained at the Winter Olympics in Canada, while Australia is having a record 13-year drought — is right in line with what every major study on climate change predicts: The weather will get weird; some areas will get more precipitation than ever; others will become drier than ever.

2) Historically, we know that the climate has warmed and cooled slowly, going from Ice Ages to warming periods, driven, in part, by changes in the earth’s orbit and hence the amount of sunlight different parts of the earth get. What the current debate is about is whether humans — by emitting so much carbon and thickening the greenhouse-gas blanket around the earth so that it traps more heat — are now rapidly exacerbating nature’s natural warming cycles to a degree that could lead to dangerous disruptions.

3) Those who favor taking action are saying: “Because the warming that humans are doing is irreversible and potentially catastrophic, let’s buy some insurance — by investing in renewable energy, energy efficiency and mass transit — because this insurance will also actually make us richer and more secure.” We will import less oil, invent and export more clean-tech products, send fewer dollars overseas to buy oil and, most importantly, diminish the dollars that are sustaining the worst petro-dictators in the world who indirectly fund terrorists and the schools that nurture them.

4) Even if climate change proves less catastrophic than some fear, in a world that is forecast to grow from 6.7 billion to 9.2 billion people between now and 2050, more and more of whom will live like Americans, demand for renewable energy and clean water is going to soar. It is obviously going to be the next great global industry.

China, of course, understands that, which is why it is investing heavily in clean-tech, efficiency and high-speed rail. It sees the future trends and is betting on them. Indeed, I suspect China is quietly laughing at us right now. And Iran, Russia, Venezuela and the whole OPEC gang are high-fiving each other. Nothing better serves their interests than to see Americans becoming confused about climate change, and, therefore, less inclined to move toward clean-tech and, therefore, more certain to remain addicted to oil. Yes, sir, it is morning in Saudi Arabia.

:terra:
ImageImageImage"Help I'm Falling Thru A Hole in the Flag"

"Time is the Image of Eternity."

Time is the Fire in which we burn.
User avatar
Kernos
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 5243
Age: 68
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 16:19
Location: Lost in the Woods in the Ozarks, USA
Gender: Male

Re: Global Weirding Is Here

Postby DJ Droood » 18 Feb 2010, 20:27

It sucks to be yous, but I haven't had to shovel my driveway since just after Xmas, and it feels like one of those mystical OBOD February "snow bell" springs I've read about in the Gwers....

Even the weather likes to go retro.

Leggings are back, so are shoulder pads, and it is once again fashionable to blame El Niño for just about everything — including this winter’s lack of snow.

Ottawa has been grey, drab and mild to a point that astonishes even Dave Phillips, a senior climatologist with Environment Canada.

“I never thought I’d ever see the day where Washington had 50-per-cent more snow than Ottawa,” Phillips said. “You’re known as the snowiest national capital in the world and you’re going to lose that reputation.”
ImageImageImage
2010 LI
2011 LI
2013 BS
Image
12/10-Ancestors
"If organized religion is the opium of the masses, then disorganized religion is the marijuana of the lunatic fringe."
Kerry Thornley
User avatar
DJ Droood
 
Posts: 5366
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 18:52
Location: North Eastern North America
Gender: Male

Re: Global Weirding Is Here

Postby Merlyn » 18 Feb 2010, 21:52

NOW THAT IS SPOT ON!
However, China isn't a clean place... and a few other odd things. But over-all this is what the world needs to hear.
I will say that trapped greenhouse gases can cause a warming, but can also trigger other reactions from the atmosphere, and the globe itself isn't what warms, it is the ocean surface.

Why is this critical?
The ocean shift will bring the weather, like we see across America now, to our front door.
Why did climate gate happen?
IMO because information was coveted to gain international and government control, not real change. Why do I say this? Because of the nuclear agenda standing in the shadows..

As a result, America was fooled into thinking the winters would all but disappear, and no one was prepared for what rightfully is called global weirdness in this article.
The truth is, greenhouse gases could cause any number of changes, to include the coldest winter in one place and ocean shift in currents bringing warm climate to the far north.

So what do we do, take our Nissan and strangle it? Our Toyota? while we see a totally unchecked aircraft spew NO2 into the sky right above us? Allow Africa to be plundered for uranium and have radioactive disaster built-in next to us and called green?

Do we dig up more coal and soot the air? Burn all the oxygen and cut down all the trees?

It just isn't about one thing, and population explosion will be like pouring gasoline on the fire, and make no end to the situation..

Perhaps global weirdness isn't quite accurate enough. More like global suicide... yes, that is closer to the truth. :thinking:
Image :emerit:
Dyro, Dduw, dy nawdd;
ac yn nawdd, nerth;
ac yn nerth, ddeall;
ac yn neall, gwybod;
ac o wybod, gwybod yn gyfiawn;
ac o wybod yn gyfiawn ei garu;
ac o garu, caru Duw.
Duw a phob daioni.
User avatar
Merlyn
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 9194
Age: 54
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 23:56
Location: By candle light, penning the dragon's dream.
Gender: Male


Return to Environmental Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest