cursuswalker wrote:No that is an assumption on your part. I would argue that the real minefield is for the literal polytheist, for whom those gods really exist and really required such sacrifices.
Which is a assumption on your part.
cursuswalker wrote:No that is an assumption on your part. I would argue that the real minefield is for the literal polytheist, for whom those gods really exist and really required such sacrifices.
Arth Frown wrote:cursuswalker wrote:Arth Frown wrote:Wiki has a phrase from Margaret Visser "a person is what he or she is in the eyes of other people."
Well that's rubbish for a start, as it makes no alowance for personal autonomy and respect for the individual and their personal choices.
By that logic, a black man living in a town full of bigots is, in fact, nothing more than a worthless n****r. A disgusting view to take.
Phrases seldom give allowances. The context of the phrase is about honour not racists.
How does a atheist druid love the gods of the ancestors if from a atheist standpoint they do not exist? You can't love nothing.
Again your inflexibility of thinking betrays you.
You can love an idea, even more so if it meant so much to your ancestors. I guess you either see that or you don't. I do and you don't <shrug>
Arth Frown wrote:cursuswalker wrote:No that is an assumption on your part. I would argue that the real minefield is for the literal polytheist, for whom those gods really exist and really required such sacrifices.
Which is a assumption on your part.
cursuswalker wrote:Oh so you don't think really exist? Then you are an atheist with regard to those gods and are purely arguing with yourself.
Arth Frown wrote:cursuswalker wrote:Oh so you don't think really exist? Then you are an atheist with regard to those gods and are purely arguing with yourself.
I'm not arguing, just trying to find out what atheist druids thinking is. It's been made a little clearer




DJ Droood wrote:I'm curious as to your motivation in this thread, Arth Frown...you've already stated that you regard druidry as an "add on" to your Christianity...are you in "The Athiest Druid" thread in the Skeptical Druids forum...to witness?...reaffirm your spiritual choices? Bring an athiest to the light? I think the OP's position, and that of other non-theist druids has been made clear and repeated several times already....perhaps we should carry on this conversation in The Christian-Druid Path thread and hammer away there for awhile....
cursuswalker wrote:I'm not sure Arth said the thing about an add-on to christianity, in fact I'd be very surprised if he did!
Arth Frown wrote:I don't think druidry is a stand alone thing. Just a add on to whatever you follow.




DJ Droood wrote:I'm curious as to your motivation in this thread, Arth Frown...you've already stated that you regard druidry as an "add on" to your Christianity...are you in "The Athiest Druid" thread in the Skeptical Druids forum...to witness?...reaffirm your spiritual choices? Bring an athiest to the light? I think the OP's position, and that of other non-theist druids has been made clear and repeated several times already....perhaps we should carry on this conversation in The Christian-Druid Path thread and hammer away there for awhile....
DJ Droood wrote:Consider the case of the training god, Santa Clause (or your quaint regional variation), who I can say I loved, trusted and believed in with all my heart. My older sister, a nasty young proto-athiest, told me over several xmases that Santa wasn't real, but the television specials and songs, and most importantly, my imagination and need to believe, told me she was wrong. Eventually...I don't remember exactly when...I had pieced together enough evidence...finding gifts from Santa in the cold storage room on the 23rd...an awakening pubescent rationality....to gradually disbelieve in Santa. Later, I would be able to conceptualize Santa as a metaphore for "the spirit of giving" or "my parent's love".....I loved the idea and rituals of Santa enough to play the same game with my kids.
So maybe all this atheism business is just post-tramatic reaction to Santa....
Arth Frown wrote:I said druidry is a add on because you have atheist, wiccan, hindu, and polytheist druids. Which to me is why drudry is a add on to any world outlook or at least a way of enhancing that.




day_2k wrote:Do most contemporary pagans actually believe in the gods as discrete, autonomous entities that can have some kind of physical impact on us or the natural world, or are they seen by the majority as a for of Jungian Archetype?
With the druidic gods, is it a case of the Egregore or thought form? (not wanting to belittle them or other’s beliefs in any way)
For example, with enough people being performing rituals and singing songs to, for instance Santa the god of Coca-Cola, does this much belief and devotion create a very real entity?
I also wanted to ask the Atheists... Do you engage with the “magic” of Druidry (not that I actually have much of an idea on how it works or what you do as yet as it seems to be a little bit unspoken from what I can tell so far?) and, if you do, do you believe it works? I imagine you don’t put this down to any kind of divine intervention/interaction?




Hawthorn_Ent wrote:How is an atheist ritual done? On a pagan or Christian one, a deity is usually involved.



day_2k wrote:Do you engage with the “magic” of Druidry and, if you do, do you believe it works?



it is one of my favorite things to hear people tell me about their particular take on established ideas and how they manifest. 
day_2k wrote: I came from a Chaos Magic stance where we are told that belief itself is the key to a powerful work and that “nothing is true, all is permitted.” (– William Burroughs)



Davin Raincloud wrote:I'm very skeptical of ideas of karma.




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest