by AndyN » 09 Jul 2006, 11:58
Yes KDL is good.
You may want to consider which version of Cornish you want to learn though. Cornish has had to be reconstructed and there are differeing views about which is the most authentic.
At the moment the main contenders are Kernewek Kemmyn, Unified Cornish, Unified Cornish Revised and Late Cornish.
KDL caters for, I think, both Unified and KK - at least it used to.
Unified Cornish is what everyone used until the 1960s. It's mostly the work of Robert Morton Nance and is the version of Cornish still used by the Cornish Gorsedh. However once academics had pointed out that because Morton Nance left no comprehensive notes demonstrating how he had authenticated what he did the language was looked at again.
Some carried on using UC. It's OK - there are quite a lot of texts in it, but it doesn't have a phonetic spelling system. It's quite close to many of the historic texts and its based on Middle Cornish from the period before English had a marked effect on its grammar.
One group developed Kernewek Kemmyn. They looked at Middle Cornish and worked out the grammar from scratch and added a phonetic spelling system, which makes it easier to learn. UC and KK are very close cousins, though there are some small differences in pronunciation, showing what a good job Mortion-Nance did. There are far more books and other resources available in KK than in any other version of Cornish. It's the most widely used in Cornwall. It is criticised by those who don't like it for its phonetic spellings and because computers were used to carry out an analysis of phonemes etc. in the old texts some people like to call it computer Cornish.
Another group decided to look at Cornish as it was last spoken and there is now a quite vociferous Late Cornish lobby. The grammar is somewhat more "stream-lined" than the other versions and more like English. At one time it was said that you could use any spelling for any word that had been written down, but lately there has been a standardisation.
The new kid on the block is Unified Cornish Revised. It's an improvement on UC but is not so far as I know based on a re-analysis of the language from the bottom up. It doesn't have a phonetic spelling system. Some people think it might be the version that everyone can agree to use, but these are Cornish people we're talking about...
I recommend KK, but Late Cornish is just as "authentic". I don't see any advantage in using UC and am a tad unconvinced that a few tweaks deasl with some of the problems with it so I'm not altogether convinced by UCR. I have tried repeatedly to find any books, leaflets, etc. in it in local shops with no success.
If anyone is feeling like finding out more about the controversy about Cornish language then the annual series "Cornish Studies" published by the University of Exeter Press contains quite a few heated articles.
Bennathow
Andy N