Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.....

Discuss music and musical instruments and lore, offer your musical efforts for promotion, critique and listening.

Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.....

Postby Keri » 02 Jul 2010, 03:16

Nature’s Music Pitch (except from Touchstone article)

Peace and relaxation, the instantaneous effect I receive from listening to Nature’s music pitch A (note) = 432 Hz. (International Concert pitch being A = 440 Hz). I am a great lover of music and enjoy most styles and eras of it. However nothing prepared me for the wonder of listening to music the way Nature intended.

I am classically trained in Piano, Trumpet, French Horn, Singing, and most recently Celtic Folk Harp. Whilst at school I was a member of a number of Choirs and Bands, as well as Symphony Orchestras and City Bands over the years. So music has always been part of my life. Though since studying Druidry my true passion for music has been ignited. I now feel I have a more beautiful admiration for music.

A few years ago I came across the pitch A = 432 Hz. Then after moving a couple of times and having two wonderful daughters, I’d completely forgotten all about it. Well a few days after completing the Ovate Grade I had an Awen encounter, and Nature’s music pitch just popped into my head. Then a few days later Alban Hefin (S.H. 21st December 2009) I visited my Sacred Grove. My Guides informed me healing music is what I am to pursue and to research 432 Hz and see how I feel about it.

I listened to a piano piece A = 432 Hz and after only a couple of notes I felt really relaxed. Straight afterwards I listened to the same piece A = 440 Hz where I became tense, particularly in my head. This totally surprised me, the dramatic difference just 8 Hz can make. If you’d been watching me at the time I’m sure you would have seen my jaw hit the floor I was that amazed! I felt there was certainly something in this, so I researched some more and I found some things to note.
• Ancient instruments have been found to be tuned A = 432 Hz with seemingly only a few exceptions, according to findings from archaeological digs.
• 440 Hz is the vibration of the frontal lobes (head).
• 432 Hz is felt more in the heart area, and whole body.
• 432 Hz is linked with the Fibonacci Spiral and is therefore part of nature.


I have since obtained a couple of tuning forks with this tuning (A and also middle C); they are fantastic as a quick way to relax! My harp is tuned to nature's music pitch and I have found it even more wonderfully relaxing to play with this tuning.

[If you like to google I recommend: 432 hz tuning]

:yay: I'd love to hear of other people's experiences of Nature's Music Pitch........
Bright Blessings,
Keri
LOVE LIFE LIVE

Image
User avatar
Keri
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 47
Age: 35
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 12:18
Location: Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby katie bridgewater » 02 Jul 2010, 11:35

A lot of instruments do sound better when tuned slightly lower that modern convention, but that is often because the dimensions of them (eg violins) were set in the baroque period when strings were made of less highly engineered materials and instruments could not take so much tension. I'm wondering which instruments you have evidence of for of this tuning? Archaeological evidence of ancient instruments shows very little consistency for tuning, size or materials of instruments. If you are talking only of modern European instruments (Baroque period onwards) then I would suggest that is only a culturally small part of musical history.

I think it's wise to remember that the naming of notes with letters, the use of the tempered scale, the measurement of frequency and then the 'setting' of what is 'in tune' are in fact very modern western conventions and bear no relation to the music of most tribal peoples today, or of our ancient ancestors. I am a musician, trained sound therapist (for what it's worth) and with my partner, make, play and give talks about ancient music, and I find the obsession in new age and alternative circles with frequency often misses the point.

There are an infinite possible number of pitches, and human hearing is sensitive to quite a range of them. But talk of 'resonant frequencies' is a bit simplistic. The human body is a complex web of tissues. It is possible to induce brain states through sound (the oldest universal instrument is commonly thought to be the bullroarer, which does exactly this), and it is possible to explode individual cells using vibration (research into blasting cancer cells rather like we do kidney stones, is very promising), but these sounds are out of human hearing range, and usually rather unpleasant if we can detect them aurally.

IMO, we are complex beings requiring complex sound and music to stimulate us. To claim everything should be tuned around the modern concept of an A being 432 hertz just eliminates thousands of years of musical richness. What about Indian music? - they distinguish between at least 22 pitches within an octave, or Polynesian vocal music, which uses variable pitch to mirror the sliding tones of the sea. You can't allocate a set 'frequency' to this style of singing, and yet it is powerful, moving, beautiful and resonant.

The octave is a stable interval across cultures, since it is fixed by physics, and the fifth, the next tone arising from the harmonic series, is also present in pretty much every musical culture, but within the octave there are infinite possible intervals available. These patterns of intervals are just as responsible for any psychological and physiological effect of music on us. There is the nature-tone scale of Scandinavia, the individual village tunings of Gamelan, Pythagorean tunings, the list is endless. The cultural choice of which pitches to use relative to each other affects us deeply, regardless of the pitch of the root note of the instrument. We are culturally sensitive, so that what we are used to will sound 'normal' but what we are not accustomed to will sound 'out of tune'. This can change with listening habits. But the tempo, timbre, harmonic richness, texture of the music and rhythm are just as important in shaping our response.

As an example of what I mean, catchy pop songs often use a modulation upwards by a western tone or semi tone to shift the mood of the song in the final repeated chorus. Pop songs are often in similar keys to suit human singing voices, which fall within fairly specific ranges due to the size and shape of the larynx in most humans. But it is not the key, or the tuning of the root note which is so important, but the relative shift in pitch. A key change upwards increases the excitement of the listener at the precise point in the song where their interest may be waning. This key change catches the ear because it is different from the previous chorus.

The need for tuning to a specific 'note' has arisen with the orchestra, a machine for making music operated by a conductor and his team of workers. Before that, ancient and not-so-ancient people made instruments to be in tune with the others in their village, but no-one had a need to measure the absolute frequency of anything!
User avatar
katie bridgewater
 
Posts: 442
Age: 43
Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 19:50
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Keri » 03 Jul 2010, 12:49

Thank you Kate for such a wonderful response, I appreciate your down-to-earthyness.
:shake:

You have such an amazing voice, it was actually only a couple of days ago that I heard you performing, along with Corwen and Damh, at Glastonbury Town Hall Summer Gathering 2010, on youtube.

Amazingly it is the voice that everyone seems to be talking about, with regards to tuning A = 432 Hz, as apparently it has less strain on the vocal chords, which is why many opera singers and singers around the world, particularly in Italy, Germany and America, are lobying to have Conert Pitch at A = 432 Hz rather than A = 440 Hz. To me the voice is the oldest instrument, so I find it fascinating that professional singers are wanting Concert Pitch changed for health reasons.

Apparently the most precisely tuned instrument created was the Strativarius violin, was originally tuned to A = 432 Hz. Instruments from ancient cultures including Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Greecian times have been found to have this tuning also. This of course does not apply to all ancient instruments as there has indeed been such a variety of tunings all around the world, for instance some pipe organs in Churches around Europe are known to have high pitch tuning, to be closer to the heavens (which is a bit of a strain on the vocal chords of choirs, so I've heard).

I agree that so called 'new age' music seems to be going pitch crazy, and some of it just sounds awful, even in tuning A = 432 Hz..................

However there are some WONDERFUL recordings out there. For example I got a CD a couple of months ago from CD BABY: Kimba Arem "Gaearth Dreaming", an amazing musician who plays ancient instruments from around the world; the album cover even has water crystal photos taken by Dr Masaru Emoto, of her music. Her entire CD has the tuning A = 432 Hz.

I am not claiming to be an expert in the fields of science, maths or music; I have simply wanted to voice my experiences and findings to like minded people, and to find out other people's experiences with A = 432 Hz.
:)
Bright Blessings,
Keri
Last edited by Keri on 04 Jul 2010, 00:15, edited 1 time in total.
LOVE LIFE LIVE

Image
User avatar
Keri
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 47
Age: 35
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 12:18
Location: Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Corwen » 03 Jul 2010, 15:10

Keri wrote:Amazingly it is the voice that everyone seems to be talking about, with regards to tuning A = 432 Hz, as apparently it has less strain on the vocal chords, which is why many opera singers and singers around the world, particularly in Italy, Germany and America, are lobying to have Conert Pitch at A = 432 Hz rather than A = 440 Hz. To me the voice is the oldest instrument, so I find it fascinating that professional singers are wanting Concert Pitch changed for health reasons.


Well singing slightly lower is going to be easier for the voice than singing high.There wasn't any standard pitch for orchestras until relatively recently, though its probably true that the majority tuned lower than now. Historical tuning forks show pitches from 380 up to the mid 400s. It stabilised somewhere in the mid 420-450 in the early 19th century. The French settled on 435 for a long time.

As instrumentalists have tuned higher and higher over the years to get brighter sounds from their instruments there has definitely been a creeping up of pitch over the centuries. This is still happening, I know some European orchestras tune at 443 or 445 compared to the American standard of 440.

It makes sense to me that vocal parts written when 'A' meant a note anything up to 5 semitones lower than today would be very difficult to sing at modern A=440. Folk and rock singers just change the key to be comfortable, but this option isn't open to orchestras whose instruments are constructed to play inn certain keys and changing the key often results in a dramatic change in tone colour, or worse still takes a part out of the range of some instruments.

I don't imagine this demand by singers is to do with any mystical qualities of 432, more to do with the fact that some vocal parts are now, after 400 years of rising pitches, almost unsingable.

Apparently the most precisely tuned instrument created was the Strativarius violin, was originally tuned to A = 432 Hz. Instruments from ancient cultures including Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Greecian times have been found to have this tuning also. This of course does not apply to all ancient instruments as there has indeed been such a variety of tunings all around the world, for instance some pipe organs in Churches around Europe are known to have high pitch tuning, to be closer to the heavens (which is a bit of a strain on the vocal chords of choirs, so I've heard).


Do you mean the Stradivarius was tap tuned to 432 (ie the body resonated at 432- or more likely whatever G would be in a scale with A at 432) or that when it was played the strings were tuned to a scale with A at 432 Hz? Both would seem hard to prove, most Strads have been extensively modified and only a couple exist with their original necks (the Baroque fiddle had a smaller neck, lower bridge and lower tension strings than is standard now) so that would make getting a sense of the tap tuned natural resonant frequency of the instrument difficult. As I said above, the tunings of classical music have varied greatly, and pitch pipes and tuning forks give different frequencies even within the same area and time. So how would one prove that an instrument had been played with the strings tuned to a given pitch?

I make ancient instruments for a living and I'd love to know your sources for the tunings of ancient Egyptian and Greek instruments. Could you post them here?

Tuning forks were only invented around 1700, so it would be hard to know the pitches instruments were tuned too. Stringed instruments can obviously be tuned to widely differing pitches depending on the thickness, material and tension of the strings. Even if an Egyptian lyre had survived with strings inttact there would be no way to know how it was tuned, beyond a wide range of possibilities. Likewise reed instruments pitch depends on the set up of the reeds as well as the structure of the instrument, size of holes and length/bore of the tube. That leaves us with flutes. The ancient Egyptians had transverse flutes, which would give a fairly narrow range of pitch for a given fingering (though this can be changed with embouchoure). There are surviving Egyptian flutes, which according to some scholars seem to show they used an odd whole tone scale, (though I am always suspicious of these things, I bet other scales were possible with cross fingering), whilst other scholars point at flutes which produced an 8 note octave with semitones. I'm not aware of their being any agreement as to the pitch of these instruments, but I'd love to know if you have a source for that. I don't know anything about modern scholarship on surviving Greek flutes, I do have a book from about 15 years ago on Greek and Roman music, and it doesn't mention any standardisation of pitch in these ancient instruments. Again, I look forward to finding out more from you about this.

Old pipe organs tend to be very high pitched, not because they were made that way, but because as they are tuned and retuned the pipes tend to get shorter and shorter.

I agree that so called 'new age' music seems to be going pitch crazy, and some of it just sounds awful, even in tuning A = 432 Hz..................

However there are some WONDERFUL recordings out there. For example I got a CD a couple of months ago from CD BABY: Kimba Arem "Gaearth Dreaming", an amazing musician who plays ancient instruments from around the world; the album cover even has water crystal photos taken by Dr Masaru Emoto, of her music. Her entire CD has the tuning A = 432 Hz.

I am not claiming to be an expert in the fields of science, maths or music; I have simply wanted to voice my experiences and findings to like minded people, and to find out other people's experiences with A = 432 Hz.
:)
Bright Blessings,
Keri Patten


I'm sure peoples musicality (or lack thereof) will come across, however they fine tune their instruments!

Lastly, and most importantly, you talk about A=432 tuning. What about all the other notes in the scale? If we tune our A to 432, we must still decide how to tune all our other notes. The standard today is to have an octave divided into 12 equal semitones, this is called Equal Temperament and was popularised by Bach. However it isn't the only way to tune our notes. Up till Bach people used a variety of tuning systems with semitones of different sizes. Equal Temparament is a very modern invention, and sounds very nasty to people who haven't got used to it, like us!

Still in much world music there is no agreement on the size of semitones (Indian music for instance uses variable semitones depending on the raga, and the instruments have moveable frets to accommodate this). Some European folk musicians tune to Just Intonation, where the relationships of frequencies between the notes are decided by small whole number ratios. Pythagorean tuning, derived from the position of harmonics on a string, is an example of a system of Just Intonation. Then we come to exotic but still nature derived scales, such as the NatureTone scale used in some Scandinavian and Eastern European folk musics, where the intervals between the notes are derived from the harmonics generated by an open and closed ended pipe, like a willow flute, fujara or koncovka. These intervals are wildly different from either Just Intonation or Equal Temperament.

So having decided we will put our A at 432 Hz, where shall we put the rest of our notes? This decision will impact more on the sound of our music than the position of our A. I may be playing in a scale or mode that doesn't even have an A in it for a start!

So what assumptions about scale are we making when we talk of A=432Hz?
My Homepage, music, instrument making, articles, pilgrimage and more! http://www.ancientmusic.co.uk
My Blog: http://www.katecorwen.wordpress.com
My Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/KATEandCORWEN
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kate-Cor ... 840?ref=hl
User avatar
Corwen
 
Posts: 1718
Age: 40
Joined: 14 May 2008, 09:46
Location: East Dorset
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Keri » 04 Jul 2010, 00:14

Thanks for your input Corwen. I enjoy listening to ancient instruments and admire the skills and artistry required in making instruments. My harp was hand made here in Australia, and it is a beautiful instrument.

Corwen wrote:So having decided we will put our A at 432 Hz, where shall we put the rest of our notes?


I am in no way trying to discredit anyone.

Nor am I trying to change Concert Pitch single handedly. LOL.

Keri wrote:I have simply wanted to voice my experiences and findings to like minded people, and to find out other people's experiences with A = 432 Hz.


I love music and was fascinated by this particular tuning. I enjoy listening to my harp as I play it with the tuning of A = 432 Hz, (changed from A = 440 Hz), and for the record I use an electric tuner set to A = 432 Hz, so I don't work out the maths, I`m a musician not a mathematician. :grin:

I recommend Google, for what I'm talking about is as easy to find as a few clicks. If your interested.......... :wink: You'll be able to find LOTS of info on A = 432 Hz tuning.

Bright Blessings,
Keri
Last edited by Keri on 04 Jul 2010, 01:19, edited 1 time in total.
LOVE LIFE LIVE

Image
User avatar
Keri
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 47
Age: 35
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 12:18
Location: Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Corwen » 04 Jul 2010, 01:17

I don't care what pitch people tune to (I certainly have no particular attachment to A=440), but it seems this A=432 thing is based on a lack of understanding about scales and tuning- 12 tone equal temperament is so new (slowly gaining popularity from about 1600 onwards) and so different from other previous tunings that any scale, regardless of which pitch your A is tuned to will be radically different from any scale from any older culture.

If you tune to 12 tone equal temperament, using an electronic tuner, then your A will be at 432 but all the other notes will be at frequencies decided by the temperament you have chosen. Since no other cultures except some European classical musicians after 1600 ever used 12 tone equal temperament, your scale will be very different from any ancient scale, only the note A will be the same, all other 11 will have different frequencies. Likewise if you used any other tuning systems, naturetone, mean temperament, just intonation and so on, unless you happen to choose both the pitch and tuning system used by the ancient culture in question. IMO this really is the crux of the matter.

I have tried to google this, but the websites I have found are so full of pseudo science and innacurate information I gave up trying to find a sensible one making any kind of coherent case. My favourite was a long diatribe on the symbolic properties of the piano keys and their numbers (52 white and 36 black) wondering if Bartolomeo Cristofori knew about this when he designed it. The downside of this being that Bartolomeo Cristofori's pianos only had 54 keys, and that the 88 keys is just one of the most currently popular of a range of piano sizes which exist and have existed!

Even the symbolism of the number 432 is gone into at great length on these sites, not realising that while this may be the number of oscillations in a second at 432 Hz, but this is essentially meaningless as soon as you consider that a 'second' is simply an agreed upon measure of time with no external physical reality. The alleged mathematical relationship between 432 and the speed of light is gone into at length, all the time ignoring the fact that the speed of light measured in miles per second is again an arbitrary number, both miles and seconds being convenient ways to divide up time and space, but neither having any grounding in a universal constant. If we were to measure the speed of light in Roman miles, or Imperial French miles, we would get different numbers!

I'm glad that you like your harp strings a bit slacker- they will last longer though not be quite as loud- it may be also that the harp resonates better tuned slightly flatter (I have 1 fiddle which sounds better tuned flat, and another which sounds better tuend slightly sharp) but the case for any special properties for the tuning seems to be entirely pseudoscience.
My Homepage, music, instrument making, articles, pilgrimage and more! http://www.ancientmusic.co.uk
My Blog: http://www.katecorwen.wordpress.com
My Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/KATEandCORWEN
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kate-Cor ... 840?ref=hl
User avatar
Corwen
 
Posts: 1718
Age: 40
Joined: 14 May 2008, 09:46
Location: East Dorset
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Keri » 04 Jul 2010, 01:50

Keri wrote:I have simply wanted to voice my experiences and findings to like minded people, and to find out other people's experiences with A = 432 Hz.


Corwen, you asked me to post on this topic, after my other topic in the Music Forum on asking for assistance on whether to lever my harp or not. If you don't like this topic that's cool.

I am interested in the healing qualities of A = 432 Hz tuning, so are many other people. But like any vibrational healing modality, what works for one person, may or may not be right for another.

:) SMILE, it makes people wonder what your thinking of!

Bright Blessings,
Keri
LOVE LIFE LIVE

Image
User avatar
Keri
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 47
Age: 35
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 12:18
Location: Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Corwen » 04 Jul 2010, 02:14

I think you misunderstand me if you think I don't like this topic, I love music and have devoted my life to it, and to encouraging people to play it and express themselves through it. Its not that I don't like this topic! I was honestly hoping to learn something about the thinking behind the A=432 thing, but I have to conclude there isn't any thinking behind it, and it is a harebrained idea held to by people who don't have enough music theory to really understand what they are saying. Unless you can point me at some sources which say otherwise. I'd really like very much to know. Maybe you can point me to a website that I haven't found? Or to a proponent of the theory who has a good grounding in acoustic physics and music theory?

No amount of smiling can make something incorrect and untrue into something true!

I think New Age pseudo-science does a great disservice to those people who use music for physical, spiritual and mental healing, or simply to bring people together. Great work has been done into the genuinely powerful effects pitch, tempo, scale, harmony and melody have on the human organism, especially by those working with music in hospitals and the field of music thanatology, the latter being particularly worthwhile. These developments are worth studying for any Bard. IMO this New Age pseudo-science about frequencies just muddies the water, it is like the old snake-oil salesmen who give medicine a bad name! So many well meaning people are parted from their money by folk who deliberately misrepresent or possibly simply don't understand the illogicality of what they are selling and repeat it parrot fashion, there are so many sound therapy courses full of this sort of meaningless stuff. Just because we are Druids doesn't mean we have to check our wits in at the door...
My Homepage, music, instrument making, articles, pilgrimage and more! http://www.ancientmusic.co.uk
My Blog: http://www.katecorwen.wordpress.com
My Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/KATEandCORWEN
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kate-Cor ... 840?ref=hl
User avatar
Corwen
 
Posts: 1718
Age: 40
Joined: 14 May 2008, 09:46
Location: East Dorset
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Dendrias » 04 Jul 2010, 12:12

Sorry to pop in without being asked, without contributing much to the discussion. Very interesting, btw.

What puzzled me was this:
Corwen wrote:The alleged mathematical relationship between 432 and the speed of light is gone into at length, all the time ignoring the fact that the speed of light measured in miles per second is again an arbitrary number, both miles and seconds being convenient ways to divide up time and space, but neither having any grounding in a universal constant.

The speed of light is measured in metres per second (at least in mainland Europe). It's 299 792 458 m(etres)/s. :grin:
Adding to the confusion is, that a metre is the distance, light in vacuum travels through in the 299 792 458th part of a second.

Again, I apologise for popping in.
Dendrias
 
Posts: 580
Age: 36
Joined: 03 Mar 2009, 11:12
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Corwen » 04 Jul 2010, 21:55

Dendrias wrote:Sorry to pop in without being asked, without contributing much to the discussion. Very interesting, btw.

What puzzled me was this:
Corwen wrote:The alleged mathematical relationship between 432 and the speed of light is gone into at length, all the time ignoring the fact that the speed of light measured in miles per second is again an arbitrary number, both miles and seconds being convenient ways to divide up time and space, but neither having any grounding in a universal constant.

The speed of light is measured in metres per second (at least in mainland Europe). It's 299 792 458 m(etres)/s. :grin:
Adding to the confusion is, that a metre is the distance, light in vacuum travels through in the 299 792 458th part of a second.

Again, I apologise for popping in.


Obviously you can measure the speed of light in whatever units you like, that is the point. In fact, make up your own unit, its just as valid. I mentioned miles per second because one of the websites about A=432 (http://www.carnaval.com/music432/) says how its important that the number 432 multiplied by itself gives a figure close to the speed of light in miles per second. My point being that since miles and seconds are both arbitrary units these numbers and any relationship between them is coincidence, one number has to be the square root of the speed of light in any given unit!

If we measure it in m/sec and take the square we get 17314, a US coastguard radio frequency in Hz, and the zip code of Delta Pennsylvania... If the 741 inhabitants of Delta started to claim their town was the centre of the universe or something because of this coincidence, or the coastguard treated his radio frequency as especially effective or sacred they would get treated as seriously as they'd deserve!
My Homepage, music, instrument making, articles, pilgrimage and more! http://www.ancientmusic.co.uk
My Blog: http://www.katecorwen.wordpress.com
My Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/KATEandCORWEN
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kate-Cor ... 840?ref=hl
User avatar
Corwen
 
Posts: 1718
Age: 40
Joined: 14 May 2008, 09:46
Location: East Dorset
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Keri » 13 Jul 2010, 08:16

A fascinating website about A = 432Hz tuning is: omega432.com

:)
Bright Blessings,
Keri
LOVE LIFE LIVE

Image
User avatar
Keri
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 47
Age: 35
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 12:18
Location: Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Explorer » 13 Jul 2010, 09:18

Corwen wrote:I think you misunderstand me if you think I don't like this topic, I love music and have devoted my life to it, and to encouraging people to play it and express themselves through it. Its not that I don't like this topic! I was honestly hoping to learn something about the thinking behind the A=432 thing, but I have to conclude there isn't any thinking behind it, and it is a harebrained idea held to by people who don't have enough music theory to really understand what they are saying. Unless you can point me at some sources which say otherwise. I'd really like very much to know. Maybe you can point me to a website that I haven't found? Or to a proponent of the theory who has a good grounding in acoustic physics and music theory?

No amount of smiling can make something incorrect and untrue into something true!


Thank you for your post Corwen.

I am sure that 432Hz has healing properties for people who believe in that, like good electrical guitar solo's have healing properties for me *grin*, the power of our minds can be amazing in that sense.

I was intriqued by the concept, but I don't know much about the history and science of music, and I suspected that this might be one of those new age dead ends designed to confuse us sprititual seekers. So, thank you for busting this myth and putting things in perspective.

:damh:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

Image
User avatar
Explorer
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 2434
Age: 46
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 22:54
Location: The Netherlands
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Corwen » 13 Jul 2010, 11:25

I think any special properties from A=432 music come not from the pitch but from the fact that most people who are playing in that pitch are also tuning using the Pythagorean tuning system. This does make a genuine difference as Pythagorean intervals are truly consonant in the single key you are using (although sometimes horrible in other keys) rather than slightly dissonant in every key like equal temperament.

Of course you can use Pythagorean tuning in any pitch.
My Homepage, music, instrument making, articles, pilgrimage and more! http://www.ancientmusic.co.uk
My Blog: http://www.katecorwen.wordpress.com
My Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/KATEandCORWEN
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kate-Cor ... 840?ref=hl
User avatar
Corwen
 
Posts: 1718
Age: 40
Joined: 14 May 2008, 09:46
Location: East Dorset
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Keri » 17 Jul 2010, 23:47

Perhaps this topic may have been more appropriate in "The Healing Sanctuary"! :grin:

:) Oh, and I pretty much just play in C major on my harp, I love happy music!

Though I must admit I enjoy listening to ACDC, who apparently, when recording, tuned up to the first person who arrived in the studio, no matter what they were tuned to!!! :-)

Bright Blessings,
Keri
LOVE LIFE LIVE

Image
User avatar
Keri
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 47
Age: 35
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 12:18
Location: Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby wyeuro » 18 Jul 2010, 02:21

i'm loving this thread. :yay: i'm a folk singer and stuff like this is so liberating!!!!!! it may change my life - even lengthen it!!!! :cloud9:
i mean, i've never in forty years of playing it, felt confident about tuning a guitar. it's like, i'm no good in power struggles where i haven't got the courage of my convictions, and my guitar always wins, slacks itself down a fraction of a semitone or so, to where the resonances always start howling up totally beautiful harmonies all of their own making while i just pluck away at the strings. but i can never tune it so as to play with anyone else, because everyone else knows how to tune a guitar. so i'm not so stoopid, eh? what a liberation! :cloud9:
wyverne /|\
visit my druid blog: http://wyldwyverne.wordpress.com/

images/smilies/gold-acorn.gif

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

in the peace of the grove
User avatar
wyeuro
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 1602
Age: 61
Joined: 20 May 2003, 08:36
Location: oz
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby celticmodes » 19 Jul 2010, 15:41

I find the subject of standard tuning and for that matter temperament tunings to be fascinating. I am open to the idea that specific vibrations can affect the human body but I am not yet convinced. I look forward to being convinced, though :-)

One sentence in the OP post that sent a red flag to my somewhat informed mind was this "• Ancient instruments have been found to be tuned A = 432 Hz with seemingly only a few exceptions, according to findings from archaeological digs."

Playing both flute (wooden) and harp, I am aware of how difficult, if not impossible, it would be to ascertain that the original tuning of an organic instrument could be guessed down to the hertz level. Organic instruments start to change from the day they are made and played as the wood changes shape, loses moisture, etc. And ancient instrument would be near impossible to say for certainty what scale (for sure) it was tuned let alone what hertz a note was originally played at.

If someone came to me and asked "what was this A tuned to on this flute 2000 years ago" I would have to somehow take the current remains, model the physical measurements, study the grain would have affected how it warped and then through a computer un-warp it. Then I'd have to study the embouchure and the minute undercuttings of the sound holes AND know the style that the flute was blown when played. Still after all these guesses, I couldn't know for sure...all would be a guess.

Does this make sense? The science is simply not able to support that original statement. Even stone or metal instruments would suffer from the same reconstruction problems. Molecules would be missing. What temperature was it played at? What method was employed? Every single variable affects the Hz that a "A" would sound.
User avatar
celticmodes
 
Posts: 49
Age: 48
Joined: 15 Jul 2010, 18:50
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Corwen » 19 Jul 2010, 16:25

wyeuro wrote:i'm loving this thread. :yay: i'm a folk singer and stuff like this is so liberating!!!!!! it may change my life - even lengthen it!!!! :cloud9:
i mean, i've never in forty years of playing it, felt confident about tuning a guitar. it's like, i'm no good in power struggles where i haven't got the courage of my convictions, and my guitar always wins, slacks itself down a fraction of a semitone or so, to where the resonances always start howling up totally beautiful harmonies all of their own making while i just pluck away at the strings. but i can never tune it so as to play with anyone else, because everyone else knows how to tune a guitar. so i'm not so stoopid, eh? what a liberation! :cloud9:
wyverne /|\


A lot of instruments sound better slightly flat, for two reasons. Firstly sometimes the instrument resonates better at a lower frequency, especially older instruments made to play at baroque pitch, around A=400 hz. However sometimes instruments resonate better at a higher frequency, but we aren't likely to notice this because of the second reason, namely strings often sound richer at slightly less tension than they are designed for (by tuning our instrument sharp the effect of increased tension outweighs any gain from increased resonance). This might sound paradoxical, as surely strings would be designed to sound their best, you might think? However strings are usually made to sound as loud as possible for a given pitch, and this means they produce a lot of volume at the expense of tone. Stiffer (thicker, heavier) strings are louder, but also more rod like acoustically and less rich in overtones. A higher action will have the same effect, increase volume at the cost of richness by increasing downforce through the bridge and making the strings act more rod like. So if you want a richer (albeit quieter) tone from your instrument, without tuning flat, use light gauge strings!

Celticmodes, I agree with your post absolutely. There is no way to determine the original pitches of ancient instruments, only pottery and bone fipple flutes are likely to be still playable and give an idea of their original note, and even these will vary depending on technique and fingerings. Pitch is obviously important otherwise we would play everything in the same key, and our music would have no pitch component and be on a monotone! But that said I don't believe the precise tuning is important, though the tuning system has a big influence since this determines the sizes of scale intervals.
My Homepage, music, instrument making, articles, pilgrimage and more! http://www.ancientmusic.co.uk
My Blog: http://www.katecorwen.wordpress.com
My Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/KATEandCORWEN
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kate-Cor ... 840?ref=hl
User avatar
Corwen
 
Posts: 1718
Age: 40
Joined: 14 May 2008, 09:46
Location: East Dorset
Gender: Male

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Keri » 20 Jul 2010, 00:41

Keri wrote:• Ancient instruments have been found to be tuned A = 432 Hz with seemingly only a few exceptions, according to findings from archaeological digs.


:where:
There may be a possibility that I have been missinformed here, internet research has it's issues eh? I really appreciate being put straight by those who really know there stuff! Thanks Corwen, and celticmodes.

What I'm really interested in is the vibrational healing qualities. I'd like to explore the harmonics. (Thanks celticmodes for the suggestions in the harp lever topic.)

So glad you like this topic Wyverne! :grin:

Bright Blessings,
Keri
LOVE LIFE LIVE

Image
User avatar
Keri
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 47
Age: 35
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 12:18
Location: Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby wyeuro » 20 Jul 2010, 04:13

g'day, Keri :hiya:
visit my druid blog: http://wyldwyverne.wordpress.com/

images/smilies/gold-acorn.gif

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

in the peace of the grove
User avatar
wyeuro
OBOD Druid
 
Posts: 1602
Age: 61
Joined: 20 May 2003, 08:36
Location: oz
Gender: Female

Re: Nature's Music Pitch A = 432Hz Tuning. Have your say.

Postby Ghiúis » 03 Oct 2010, 13:53

There are some very interesting discussions around this topic in the world of Waldorf (Steiner) education, where I am a music teacher. In America at least, there is a movement to have all music for early childhood classes pitched at 432.

I have played and sung a lot of early music, and several of the string players I used to work with in Minneapolis, Minnesota had two instruments--one they played at 432 and one they played at 440. We consistently tuned down to 432A for all consort pieces before JS Bach. It worked especially well with the organs we used.

I know that there are some orchestras in Japan that are using a higher tuning than 440-I think it is 445 A. Interesting to see how temperment in music changes over history. There is a book on this called 'Temperment' if you care to have a deeper read.

What is important to remember is that tuning has evolved over time to meet the needs of various groups that play together, and I don't feel that one tuning system is necessarily better than another. As a pianist, I realize that the tuning of the piano is kind of dreadful but it makes the instrument work with itself. So--whatever works, right?

If you are interested, Choroi Instruments makes a whole line of pentatonic and diatonic recorders based on the 432A pitch, as well as tone bars, glockenspiels and lyres.
User avatar
Ghiúis
OBOD Ovate
 
Posts: 33
Age: 42
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 16:47
Location: Erlangen, Germany
Gender: Female

Next

Return to Music Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron